Article Text

Download PDFPDF
HIV positive and negative homosexual men have adopted different strategies for reducing the risk of HIV transmission
  1. Jonathan Elford1,
  2. Graham Bolding1,
  3. Mark Maguire2,
  4. Lorraine Sherr3
  1. 1Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences and Royal Free Centre for HIV Medicine, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, London, UK
  2. 2Camden and Islington Community Health Services NHS Trust, London, UK
  3. 3Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences and Royal Free Centre for HIV Medicine, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, London, UK
  1. Dr Jonathan Elford, Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 5QL, UK j.elford{at}pcps.ucl.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Editor,—To reduce the risk of HIV transmission, some homosexual men have adopted a strategy whereby they only have unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) with a person of the same HIV status (known as “concordant UAI”).1 In London, homosexual men in a relationship are more likely to know the HIV status of their UAI partner than men not in a relationship2 and so establish concordance. However, this was not examined for HIV positive and negative men separately. A survey conducted in January-February 2000 among homosexual/bisexual men attending one of six gyms in central London, as part of an ongoing behavioural surveillance programme,2, 3 has allowed risk reduction strategies to be considered by HIV status. A total of 792 homosexual men (median age 35 years) completed a confidential questionnaire (estimated response rate 50–60%2, 3); 126 (16.0%) were HIV positive, 477 (60.2%) HIV negative, while 169 (21.3%) had never had an HIV test (data missing for 20 men). Just over half the …

View Full Text